Picture of attorney David L. Freidberg,
"I DON'T KNOW WHAT I WOULD HAVE DONE WITHOUT HIM..."
Read More
"MY SON AND I ARE SO GRATEFUL FOR MR. FREIDBERG AND WHAT HE HAS DONE..."
Read More
"DAVID IS A PHENOMENAL LAWYER AND HIS CHARACTER SPEAKS WONDERS..."
Read More
"IF YOU NEED AN ATTORNEY IN CHICAGO, I WOULD RECOMMEND HIM IN A HEARTBEAT..."
Read More

by

Navigating the federal criminal justice system can be a daunting task, particularly when facing charges under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c). This statute imposes severe penalties for the use or possession of a firearm in connection with a crime of violence or drug trafficking crime. As a seasoned criminal defense attorney in Illinois, I have seen how these charges can drastically impact a person’s life. This article delves into the intricacies of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c), exploring the legal definitions, potential penalties, common defenses, and the importance of securing experienced legal representation.

Overview of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) and Related Statutes

18 U.S.C. § 924(c) is a federal statute that targets the use or possession of firearms in conjunction with violent crimes or drug trafficking offenses. The statute mandates mandatory minimum sentences for those convicted, emphasizing the federal government’s commitment to deterring gun violence and drug-related crimes. Specifically, 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A) states that any individual who uses or carries a firearm during and in relation to a crime of violence or drug trafficking crime, or who possesses a firearm in furtherance of such crimes, is subject to significant mandatory minimum prison terms.

Continue reading

by

Facing credit card fraud charges in Illinois under 720 ILCS 5/17-36 can be a stressful and life-changing event. The potential consequences are severe, ranging from substantial fines to lengthy prison sentences. As a seasoned criminal defense attorney based in Chicago, I have extensive experience in representing clients accused of credit card fraud. We will now provide an in-depth look at what constitutes credit card fraud under Illinois law, the potential penalties, effective defense strategies, and the importance of having a knowledgeable attorney on your side.

Understanding the Statute and Relevant Laws

Credit card fraud is covered under 720 ILCS 5/17-36, which defines the offense as using a credit or debit card without the cardholder’s consent or using a card obtained through fraudulent means to acquire goods, services, or money. This statute is comprehensive and includes various forms of fraudulent activities, such as:

Continue reading

by

As a criminal defense attorney in Chicago, I’ve seen the devastating impact that an aggravated identity theft charge can have on an individual’s life. These charges are not only severe but can also be complex to navigate. Understanding the intricacies of the statute under 720 ILCS 5/16-30(b) is crucial for anyone facing such allegations. This article aims to provide comprehensive information about what constitutes aggravated identity theft, the relevant statutes, potential penalties, common defenses, and the importance of having an experienced attorney by your side.

The Statute and Relevant Laws

Aggravated identity theft is outlined under 720 ILCS 5/16-30(b) in the Illinois Compiled Statutes. This law elevates the crime of identity theft to aggravated identity theft under certain conditions. Generally, identity theft involves using someone else’s personal information, such as social security numbers, bank account details, or credit card numbers, without their permission for fraudulent purposes. When specific aggravating factors are present, the charge becomes more serious, carrying heavier penalties.

Continue reading

by

As a seasoned criminal defense lawyer based in Chicago, I recognize the immense pressure and complexities that come with facing federal extortion charges under the Hobbs Act, found in 18 U.S.C. § 1951. This federal law encompasses a wide array of criminal actions involving extortion, robbery, and interference with commerce through threats or violence. Being charged under the Hobbs Act can significantly impact one’s life, but gaining a thorough understanding of the statute, potential penalties, defenses, and the need for experienced legal counsel can help manage this challenging situation. This article will delve into the critical aspects of federal extortion charges under the Hobbs Act, relevant statutes, and the necessity of having competent legal representation.

Analyzing the Statute and Associated Laws

The Hobbs Act, named after Congressman Sam Hobbs and enacted in 1946, targets racketeering and public corruption, addressing robbery and extortion that disrupt interstate or foreign commerce. This statute’s broad application covers numerous activities that federal law deems criminal.

Continue reading

by

As a seasoned criminal defense attorney in Chicago, I understand that facing federal assault charges can be a life-altering experience. Federal assault charges are serious offenses that can result in severe penalties, including lengthy prison sentences and hefty fines. One of the primary statutes governing federal assault charges is 18 U.S.C. § 113, which outlines various forms of assault and their corresponding penalties. In this comprehensive article, I will provide detailed information on federal assault charges under 18 U.S.C. § 113, including the relevant statutes, potential penalties, common defenses, and the importance of having skilled legal representation.

Understanding the Statute and Relevant Laws

18 U.S.C. § 113 is the federal statute that addresses assault within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States. This statute covers a range of assault offenses, each with its own set of definitions and penalties. The statute is designed to protect individuals from various forms of physical harm and to ensure that those who commit assault are held accountable for their actions.

Continue reading

by

Facing federal identity theft charges is a serious matter that can lead to significant legal consequences, including substantial prison time and heavy fines. As a seasoned criminal defense attorney in Chicago, I understand the complexity of these charges and the profound impact they can have on your life. Federal identity theft charges are primarily prosecuted under 18 U.S.C. § 1028, which encompasses a wide range of activities related to the unlawful use of identification documents and personal information. This article will provide a thorough overview of the statute, relevant laws, potential penalties, common defenses, and the importance of having skilled legal representation.

Understanding the Statute and Relevant Laws

Federal identity theft is governed by 18 U.S.C. § 1028, which criminalizes a variety of activities involving fraudulent identification documents and personal information. The statute covers the production, transfer, possession, and use of identification documents and authentication features that are fraudulent or obtained through illicit means. Here is an in-depth look at some of the key provisions of 18 U.S.C. § 1028:

Continue reading

by

When you find yourself facing federal charges for manufacturing controlled substances, the stakes couldn’t be higher. These felony penalties are severe, with the potential for lengthy prison sentences, significant fines, and the forfeiture of personal assets. Understanding the complexities of these charges is essential to mounting an effective defense. As an experienced criminal defense attorney in Chicago, I have the knowledge and expertise to guide you through this challenging process. This article provides an in-depth look at federal drug manufacturing charges under 21 U.S.C. § 841, including relevant statutes, potential penalties, common defenses, and the necessity of skilled legal representation.

The Statute and Relevant Laws

Federal drug manufacturing charges are prosecuted under 21 U.S.C. § 841. This statute makes it illegal to knowingly or intentionally manufacture, distribute, or dispense controlled substances. It also covers the possession of controlled substances with the intent to manufacture, distribute, or dispense them. The definition of “manufacture” is extensive, encompassing the production, preparation, propagation, compounding, or processing of a drug or substance, either directly or indirectly.

Continue reading

by

As an experienced criminal defense attorney in Chicago, I understand the gravity of facing federal charges, especially those involving firearms. One of the most severe and complex charges under federal law is the use of a firearm in a crime of violence or drug trafficking crime, governed by 18 U.S.C. § 924(c). This statute imposes harsh penalties and can significantly increase the severity of the underlying offense. In this article, I will provide a detailed overview of the statute, relevant laws, potential penalties, common defenses, and the importance of having skilled legal representation.

Understanding the Statute and Relevant Laws

18 U.S.C. § 924(c) is a federal statute that specifically addresses the use of firearms in connection with crimes of violence or drug trafficking offenses. The statute mandates severe penalties for individuals who use, carry, or possess a firearm during and in relation to any crime of violence or drug trafficking crime. The law is designed to deter the use of firearms in these serious offenses and to impose additional punishment on those who do.

Continue reading

by

Being charged with predatory criminal sexual assault of a child is an incredibly serious and life-altering event. Illinois law, specifically 720 ILCS 5/11-1.40, addresses instances of sexual penetration involving a child under 13 by someone aged 17 or older. These criminal charges are extremely severe, carrying both significant legal and social consequences. As an experienced criminal defense attorney in Chicago with extensive experience, I aim to provide a thorough understanding of this statute, the relevant legal framework, and the possible defense strategies.

Understanding the Statute and Relevant Laws

Under 720 ILCS 5/11-1.40, predatory criminal sexual assault of a child is defined as an act of sexual penetration by an individual 17 years or older with a child under 13. In Illinois, sexual penetration includes any contact, however slight, between the sex organ or anus of one person and an object, the sex organ, mouth, or anus of another person, or any intrusion, however slight, of any part of the body into the sex organ or anus of another person. This broad definition encompasses a wide range of sexual acts, making the statute stringent and far-reaching.

Continue reading

by

As a seasoned DUI defense attorney in Chicago, I understand the significant responsibilities that come with holding a commercial driver’s license (CDL). Commercial drivers operate large and potentially hazardous vehicles, which makes safety a paramount concern. Consequently, commercial drivers are subject to stricter blood alcohol concentration (BAC) limits and enhanced penalties compared to non-commercial drivers. These enhanced regulations are designed to ensure the highest level of safety on the roads, but they also mean that commercial drivers face more severe consequences for DUI offenses. In this article, I will discuss the relevant statutes, the stricter BAC limits, the potential penalties, and provide answers to frequently asked questions about DUI laws for commercial drivers.

Relevant Statutes and Stricter BAC Limits

In Illinois, the legal framework governing DUI offenses for commercial drivers is primarily found in the Illinois Vehicle Code (625 ILCS 5/). Specifically, 625 ILCS 5/6-515 outlines the prohibitions and penalties for commercial drivers who are found to be driving under the influence. Under this statute, a commercial driver is prohibited from operating a commercial motor vehicle with a BAC of 0.04% or higher. This is significantly lower than the 0.08% BAC limit for non-commercial drivers, reflecting the higher safety standards imposed on those who operate larger and more dangerous vehicles.

Continue reading
Contact Information
Chicago Office
70 W Madison St
#1450
Chicago, IL 60602
Phone: (312) 560-7100
DuPage Office
140 Butterfield Rd
#1500
Oakbrook Terrace, IL 60181
Skokie Office
5250 Old Orchard Rd
#300
Skokie, IL 60077

Please do not include any confidential or sensitive information in a contact form, text message, or voicemail. The contact form sends information by non-encrypted email, which is not secure. Submitting a contact form, sending a text message, making a phone call, or leaving a voicemail does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Copyright © 2026, Law Offices of David L. Freidberg, P.C.
JUSTIA Law Firm Blog Design