Picture of attorney David L. Freidberg,
"I DON'T KNOW WHAT I WOULD HAVE DONE WITHOUT HIM..."
"MY SON AND I ARE SO GRATEFUL FOR MR. FREIDBERG AND WHAT HE HAS DONE..."
"DAVID IS A PHENOMENAL LAWYER AND HIS CHARACTER SPEAKS WONDERS..."
"IF YOU NEED AN ATTORNEY IN CHICAGO, I WOULD RECOMMEND HIM IN A HEARTBEAT..."

As a seasoned criminal defense lawyer in Illinois, I understand the gravity and complexity of federal manslaughter charges. These charges, governed by 18 U.S.C. § 1112, involve serious legal implications and significant potential penalties. In this comprehensive article, I will provide an in-depth exploration of federal manslaughter charges, including relevant statutes, potential penalties, common defenses, and the critical importance of experienced legal representation. My aim is to offer a clear and thorough understanding for those facing these felony charges.

The Statute and Relevant Laws

Federal manslaughter charges are defined under 18 U.S.C. § 1112, which categorizes manslaughter into two distinct types: voluntary and involuntary. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for anyone facing such charges.

Being charged with federal mail fraud is a serious and complex legal challenge. As a seasoned criminal defense attorney in Illinois, I understand the immense pressure and uncertainty that accompany these charges. Federal mail fraud, governed by 18 U.S.C. § 1341, encompasses a wide range of fraudulent activities and carries severe penalties. In this detailed guide, I will provide an in-depth look at federal mail fraud charges, including relevant statutes, potential penalties, common defenses, and the importance of having a skilled criminal defense attorney to guide you through this difficult time.

The Statute and Relevant Laws

Federal mail fraud is primarily prosecuted under 18 U.S.C. § 1341. This statute makes it illegal to use the United States Postal Service (USPS) or any private or commercial interstate carrier as part of a scheme to defraud or to obtain money or property through false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises. The statute’s broad language allows federal prosecutors to target a wide array of fraudulent schemes that utilize the mail.

Federal assault charges are serious legal matters that can lead to significant penalties and lasting consequences. These charges are prosecuted under 18 U.S.C. § 113 and apply to assaultive behaviors occurring within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States. This jurisdiction includes federal properties such as military bases, national parks, and government buildings. Understanding the intricacies of these charges, the relevant statutes, and potential defenses is crucial for anyone facing such accusations. As a criminal defense attorney in Illinois, I will provide an in-depth exploration of federal assault charges, focusing on the legal framework, penalties, defenses, and the importance of experienced legal representation.

The Statutory Framework

18 U.S.C. § 113 is the primary federal statute governing assault charges within federal jurisdiction. This statute categorizes assault into several distinct types, each with its own legal definitions and penalties. The categories include assault with intent to commit murder, assault with intent to commit any felony, assault with a dangerous weapon, assault resulting in serious bodily injury, assault resulting in substantial bodily injury to an intimate partner, and simple assault.

Navigating the federal criminal justice system can be a daunting task, particularly when facing charges under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c). This statute imposes severe penalties for the use or possession of a firearm in connection with a crime of violence or drug trafficking crime. As a seasoned criminal defense attorney in Illinois, I have seen how these charges can drastically impact a person’s life. This article delves into the intricacies of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c), exploring the legal definitions, potential penalties, common defenses, and the importance of securing experienced legal representation.

Overview of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) and Related Statutes

18 U.S.C. § 924(c) is a federal statute that targets the use or possession of firearms in conjunction with violent crimes or drug trafficking offenses. The statute mandates mandatory minimum sentences for those convicted, emphasizing the federal government’s commitment to deterring gun violence and drug-related crimes. Specifically, 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A) states that any individual who uses or carries a firearm during and in relation to a crime of violence or drug trafficking crime, or who possesses a firearm in furtherance of such crimes, is subject to significant mandatory minimum prison terms.

Facing credit card fraud charges in Illinois under 720 ILCS 5/17-36 can be a stressful and life-changing event. The potential consequences are severe, ranging from substantial fines to lengthy prison sentences. As a seasoned criminal defense attorney based in Chicago, I have extensive experience in representing clients accused of credit card fraud. We will now provide an in-depth look at what constitutes credit card fraud under Illinois law, the potential penalties, effective defense strategies, and the importance of having a knowledgeable attorney on your side.

Understanding the Statute and Relevant Laws

Credit card fraud is covered under 720 ILCS 5/17-36, which defines the offense as using a credit or debit card without the cardholder’s consent or using a card obtained through fraudulent means to acquire goods, services, or money. This statute is comprehensive and includes various forms of fraudulent activities, such as:

As a criminal defense attorney in Chicago, I’ve seen the devastating impact that an aggravated identity theft charge can have on an individual’s life. These charges are not only severe but can also be complex to navigate. Understanding the intricacies of the statute under 720 ILCS 5/16-30(b) is crucial for anyone facing such allegations. This article aims to provide comprehensive information about what constitutes aggravated identity theft, the relevant statutes, potential penalties, common defenses, and the importance of having an experienced attorney by your side.

The Statute and Relevant Laws

Aggravated identity theft is outlined under 720 ILCS 5/16-30(b) in the Illinois Compiled Statutes. This law elevates the crime of identity theft to aggravated identity theft under certain conditions. Generally, identity theft involves using someone else’s personal information, such as social security numbers, bank account details, or credit card numbers, without their permission for fraudulent purposes. When specific aggravating factors are present, the charge becomes more serious, carrying heavier penalties.

As a seasoned criminal defense lawyer based in Chicago, I recognize the immense pressure and complexities that come with facing federal extortion charges under the Hobbs Act, found in 18 U.S.C. § 1951. This federal law encompasses a wide array of criminal actions involving extortion, robbery, and interference with commerce through threats or violence. Being charged under the Hobbs Act can significantly impact one’s life, but gaining a thorough understanding of the statute, potential penalties, defenses, and the need for experienced legal counsel can help manage this challenging situation. This article will delve into the critical aspects of federal extortion charges under the Hobbs Act, relevant statutes, and the necessity of having competent legal representation.

Analyzing the Statute and Associated Laws

The Hobbs Act, named after Congressman Sam Hobbs and enacted in 1946, targets racketeering and public corruption, addressing robbery and extortion that disrupt interstate or foreign commerce. This statute’s broad application covers numerous activities that federal law deems criminal.

As a seasoned criminal defense attorney in Chicago, I understand that facing federal assault charges can be a life-altering experience. Federal assault charges are serious offenses that can result in severe penalties, including lengthy prison sentences and hefty fines. One of the primary statutes governing federal assault charges is 18 U.S.C. § 113, which outlines various forms of assault and their corresponding penalties. In this comprehensive article, I will provide detailed information on federal assault charges under 18 U.S.C. § 113, including the relevant statutes, potential penalties, common defenses, and the importance of having skilled legal representation.

Understanding the Statute and Relevant Laws

18 U.S.C. § 113 is the federal statute that addresses assault within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States. This statute covers a range of assault offenses, each with its own set of definitions and penalties. The statute is designed to protect individuals from various forms of physical harm and to ensure that those who commit assault are held accountable for their actions.

Facing federal identity theft charges is a serious matter that can lead to significant legal consequences, including substantial prison time and heavy fines. As a seasoned criminal defense attorney in Chicago, I understand the complexity of these charges and the profound impact they can have on your life. Federal identity theft charges are primarily prosecuted under 18 U.S.C. § 1028, which encompasses a wide range of activities related to the unlawful use of identification documents and personal information. This article will provide a thorough overview of the statute, relevant laws, potential penalties, common defenses, and the importance of having skilled legal representation.

Understanding the Statute and Relevant Laws

Federal identity theft is governed by 18 U.S.C. § 1028, which criminalizes a variety of activities involving fraudulent identification documents and personal information. The statute covers the production, transfer, possession, and use of identification documents and authentication features that are fraudulent or obtained through illicit means. Here is an in-depth look at some of the key provisions of 18 U.S.C. § 1028:

When you find yourself facing federal charges for manufacturing controlled substances, the stakes couldn’t be higher. These felony penalties are severe, with the potential for lengthy prison sentences, significant fines, and the forfeiture of personal assets. Understanding the complexities of these charges is essential to mounting an effective defense. As an experienced criminal defense attorney in Chicago, I have the knowledge and expertise to guide you through this challenging process. This article provides an in-depth look at federal drug manufacturing charges under 21 U.S.C. § 841, including relevant statutes, potential penalties, common defenses, and the necessity of skilled legal representation.

The Statute and Relevant Laws

Federal drug manufacturing charges are prosecuted under 21 U.S.C. § 841. This statute makes it illegal to knowingly or intentionally manufacture, distribute, or dispense controlled substances. It also covers the possession of controlled substances with the intent to manufacture, distribute, or dispense them. The definition of “manufacture” is extensive, encompassing the production, preparation, propagation, compounding, or processing of a drug or substance, either directly or indirectly.

Contact Information